Saturday, February 14, 2009

Business Correspondence Critique

I am currently involved in a club in Science Faculty and I actually received the following email earlier this semester. The secretary of the club sent this email and it was regarding the booth duty timeslots of an event being held by the club.

______________________________________________________

Subject: Duty Replacement

Below are timeslots that need replacements permanently. Email me which slots you want to take on (will add on to what you currently have):

Mon
i) 9-10am
ii) 10-11am

Wed
i) 3-4pm
ii) 4-5pm

Fri

i) 9-10am
ii) 10-11am

These changes will take place from effect next week. Please open all of your eyes wide and see the timings properly. Don't take already and I arrange everything already then come and say u cannot blah blah blah.

XXX
______________________________________________________


The main purpose of the email above was to find replacements for the stated booth duty timeslots. However, this email was written rather badly and was found to be lacking several characteristics of effective writing.

First of all, the subject heading of this email should have been more specific. Instead of just writing "Duty Replacement", the writer should have included more information such as the name of the club and the event being held. A more suitable subject heading would be "Recruiting Booth Duty Replacements for Event A by Club B". Thus readers would be able to know the purpose of this email just by reading the subject heading.

Another problem was the lack of salutation at the beginning of this email. This being an email to all club members, a proper salutation such as "Dear all" should have been used. The absence of a salutation in any business correspondence is disrespectful and some readers might be offended.

Besides that, there were problems regarding the courtesy and correctness of the first paragraph in the above email. The two sentences in the paragraph were too blunt and should have been rephrased better using words such as "please". There were several issues with the correctness of the language used in this paragraph too. This was evident in the bracketed sentence at the end of the paragraph. Readers might not understand what the writer meant in the email by the sentence, "will add on to what you currently have". It was not stated clearly what would be added on and it was not mentioned what the writer was referring to as "what you currently have". This email also lacked completeness and did not supply enough information regarding what and where was the duty that needed replacements. It failed to mention anything about the club and event that required replacements for the booth duty. A better way of writing this paragraph would be as follow:
"This is the secretary of Club B, XXX (the secretary's name). As we all know, our club is currently organizing Event A and we have our own booth during this event. However, due to some personnel problems, we need replacements for the booth duty at LT25 during the timeslots stated below. Please take a look and email me the timeslots that you are willing to take over. If you take any of these slots, they will be added on to your current timeslots. The timeslots that need replacements are:"

The last paragraph in the email also lacked courtesy and correctness. The tone used was really inappropriate and crude. It could be seen that the writer was clearly agitated when writing this email. The second sentence was quite sarcastic while the last sentence was plain rude and grammatically incorrect. A more appropriate alternative to this paragraph would be as follow:
"Please take note that the changes in timeslots will take place starting from next week. I really appreciate it if all of you can choose the timeslots that are suitable and convenient for you so that you can make it for the booth duty on time. Thank you for your attention regarding this matter and looking forward to your reply."

The writer also failed to include a complimentary close to this email. A suitable close such as "Regards" should be present at the end of the email. As this is an official club email, the writer should have included his or her position in the club after signing off. The writer should have stated his or her position as secretary of the club.

In conclusion, this was a rather rude and badly written email. Being the secretary, the writer should have been more professional when writing this kind of email to members of the club. Any business correspondence should be revised, edited and proofread before sending it to the recipients. The tone of the correspondence should always be appropriate and a business correspondence must never be written when someone is angry or agitated.


Never send an email when you are as angry as the orang-utan above :)

10 comments:

  1. Good sample letter, excellent analysis (even though long-winded) and very apt photo! I may steal this one from you later!

    Thanks, Wee Siong!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dear Wee Siong,

    I would agree with you that emails should not be sent when one is angry. As anger will cloud judgement and affect decision making and the choice of words, sending an email at this time would only make things worse.

    I think you have done a very good analysis, perhaps you can let the secretary know how to improve her letter! (Since this is probably from Science Club I think I can guess who it is! :P)

    I think when you were typing this, you typed too fast so you missed out a word here:
    "Please take note that.. I really (would) appreciate it if all of you can choose the timeslots..."

    That was just a typing error, its nothing major. I like your analysis!

    Regards,
    Moses

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi guys,
    Thanks for all your comments so far.
    @Brad: I do agree that I can be very long-winded sometimes. I guess I must work on my conciseness in the following posts. Glad you like the photo though. That really is one pissed off orang-utan right? :)
    @Moses: You are right. I accidentally left out "would" in the sentence. This email is not from the secretary of Science Club though. I got it from another club in Science Faculty and the secretary is unfortunately a guy. :)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hey Wee Siong,
    Letters like this are quite common when it comes to bazaars. This particular email was quite blunt, rude and the secretary also fails to use proper salutations. Since there are vacancies that need to be filled he/she should have been more courteous. If I received such a letter I would just send it to the trash bin. Maybe Moses can educate the secretary on the 7C’s of writing :P
    Dinidu

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hello Wee Siong!

    I cracked when I saw the orang utan photo. Your entries never failed to entertain me:D

    I agree that the letter was written in an extremely unprofessional manner. In fact, if I were one of the recipients of this letter, I would think of doing a last minute change just to tick her off:P

    Being university students, we are expected to be trained in writing professionally. The unprofessional manner of the writing reflects how poorly the writer has performed as a secretary. In addition, it also indicates the low EQ level of the secretary himself. Someone needs to relearn his Ps and Qs.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hi Wee Siong,

    It sounds cliche, but I agree with the rest that emails should not be written in a fit of anger, or to express irritation explicitly.

    The letter was intended for internal circulation only, and the secretary probably intended it to be an informal email. However, he/she failed to realised that she was using her capacity as a club secretary to send this email to everyone. Hence, this email should be written in a formal business email format, and not an informal email used to lambast other club members.

    You have provided a great alternative email, maybe you should be elected as the club secretary instead! =P

    Having said all this, I think that Brad could impart to us some skills on communicating anger/irritation in a professional way, by using subtle sarcasm, etc, etc. Brad, what do you think? ;D

    -Daniel-

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hello Wee Siong!

    Good analysis you've got! I thought it was very thorough and detailed the way you have accurately pinpointed all the mistakes. I liked the way you phrased your suggestions which were concise, courteous and complete with all the information.

    However, I think we both share a flaw – we tend to be too long-winded! I tend to form very long sentences that go on forever whereas I feel that you elaborate too much at times which may sound repetitive. But other than that, everything else was good! (:

    Cheers!
    Wan Yu

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hi all,
    Sorry took so long to update on this comments section. As stated by all you guys, the secretary should have been more professional when writing this email even though if he felt irritated or angry at that moment. Being someone of authority like a secretary, we should never let our feelings get the better of us especially during business related issues. Well, I am glad to say that the email was only a one-off thing and subsequent letters sent by the secretary had more or less the 7Cs in it. I guess something or someone must have really angered him badly when he was writing the email.

    ReplyDelete
  9. omg. I commented here that 'As anger will cloud judgement and affect decision making and the choice of words, sending an email at this time would only make things worse.' Sorry! I meant have been 'would'. (:

    ReplyDelete
  10. Hey Moses,

    Your comment is noted. Thanks again for pointing out my mistakes. Appreciate it a lot. :)

    ws

    ReplyDelete